Why is Being ‘Inherently Distinctive’ Important to a Trademark or Service Mark?

A Strong Trademark is a Bigger Piece of Intellectual Property.


An inherently distinctive trademark is a strong trademark. An inherently distinctive trademark may be registered on the USPTO Trademark Principal Register, qualifies for more protection under more federal, state and common law and is stronger for use in business to promote authenticity and for expanding product lines. The distinctiveness of a trademark may also help protect the mark from problems with conflicting marks and counterfeiting.

The stronger the trademark the greater protection received from the courts. Nike, Inc. v. Just Did It Enterprises, 6 F.3d at 1231 (C.A.7 (Ill.), 1993) quoting Squirtco v. Seven-Up Co., 628 F.2d at 1091 (8th Cir.1980). This factor [trademark strength] can also include the likelihood of expansion of the product lines. Nike, Inc. v. Just Did It Enterprises, 6 F.3d at 1231 (C.A.7 (Ill.), 1993) quoting Grey v. Campbell Soup Co., 650 F.Supp. at 1173 (C.D.Cal.1986). See StrongTrademark.com for more information.


The opposite of an inherently distinctive mark is a descriptive mark. Descriptive marks are much harder to protect, they must first acquire secondary meaning:

"Descriptive" marks "merely describe a function, use, characteristic, size, or intended purpose of the product," such as YELLOW PAGES telephone directories and 5 MINUTE glue. And this class of marks includes those that are geographically descriptive, such as BOSTON beer produced by a Boston-based brewer, BANK OF AMERICA, and MISS U.S.A. No descriptive mark can serve as a valid trademark without evidence of secondary meaning. Barcelona.com, Inc. v. Excelentisimo Ayuntamiento De Barcelona, 330 F.3d 617, 629 (4th Cir.2003). "Secondary meaning" in connection with geographically descriptive marks means that the mark no longer causes the public to associate the goods with the geographical location, but to associate the goods with a particular product or source of the product. See Resorts of Pinehurst, Inc. v. Pinehurst Nat'l Corp., 148 F.3d 417, 421 (4th Cir.1998); Boston Beer Co. Ltd. P'ship v. Slesar Bros. Brewing Co., 9 F.3d 175, 181 (1st Cir.1993); see generally 2 McCarthy, supra, §§ 15:1-5. In this manner, KENTUCKY fried chicken and AMERICAN airlines are geographically descriptive marks that have established secondary meanings in consumers' minds, causing consumers to recognize a brand or source of fried chicken or air travel, rather than the places, Kentucky and America.

OBX-Stock, Inc. v. Bicast, Inc., 558 F.3d 334, 339 (4th Cir.2009).


"Another test of descriptive-suggestive connotations is to determine the extent to which other sellers have used the mark on similar merchandise. That is, if others are in fact using the term to describe their products, an inference of descriptiveness can be drawn."

Cutter Labs., Inc. v. Air Prods. & Chems., Inc., 189 U.S.P.Q. 108 (T.T.A.B. 1975); McCarthy § 11:69


Descriptiveness is construed broadly. [See Zatarains, Inc. v. Oak Grove Smokehouse, Inc., 698 F.2d 786, 217 USPQ 988 (5th Cir.1983)]. Indicia include: (1) the mark's dictionary definition corresponds with its meaning and context; (2) upon hearing the mark, one need not use "imagination, thought and perception to reach a conclusion as to the nature of goods;" (3) "competitors would be likely to need the terms used in the trademark in describing their products;" and (4) others have used the term in marketing a similar service or product.

Xtreme Lashes, LLC v. Xtended Beauty, Inc., 576 F.3d 221, 227 (5th Cir.2009)


Being able to associate a product or service with ®  to designate a federally registered trademark is a strong marketing tool and a strong business tool for protecting goodwill and authenticity. Purchasing decisions are continually influenced by trademarks by distinguishing products from one another and indicating a level of authenticity and quality about products and services. The International Trademark Association in their Top Ten Reasons Why You Should Care About Trademarks calls a trademark the most efficient commercial tool ever devised (www.inta.org/membersonly/ppt/TopTenReasons.final.ppt).


The stakeholders in a trademark are not just the owners of the mark, consumers benefit from knowing they are buying authentic products that are of consistent quality. Using trademarks and copyrights to protect products can help prevent the growing problems with counterfeiting and piracy. Products with registered trademarks and copyrights can be recorded with the U.S. Customs Border Protection (CBP) to protect against infringing and counterfeit imports and are more easily protected inside the U.S. through the courts and by federal and state authorities.

 

Counterfeiting and piracy are longstanding problems which are growing in scope

and magnitude. They are of concern to governments because of (i) the negative

impact that they can have on innovation, (ii) the threat they pose to the welfare of

consumers and (iii) the substantial resources that they channel to criminal networks,

organised crime and other groups that disrupt and corrupt society. They are of

concern to business because of the impact that they have on (i) sales and licensing,

(ii) brand value and firm reputation, and (iii) the ability of firms to benefit from the

breakthroughs they make in developing new products. They are of concern to

consumers because of the significant health and safety risks that substandard

counterfeit and pirated products could pose to those who consume the items.


Used with permission from the OECD. From  The Economic Impact of Counterfeiting and Piracy, © OECD 2008, www.oecd.org/sti/counterfeiting.


PLAN FOR A SUCCESSFUL, STRONG TRADEMARK

To verify a potential trademark is strong, is available to use, and is ready to register, the process should be more than a direct hit federal search. To maximize the commercial strength and minimize the weaknesses of a trademark, we start with these five steps:

1) Verify Inherent Strength (this avoids merely descriptive, geographically descriptive, likelihood of confusion and other office actions),

2) Verify Right to Use, (this avoids likelihood of confusion refusal office actions and others)

3) Verify Right to Register, (this avoids many types of refusals including merely descriptive, deceptively misdescriptive, geographically descriptive and others that can often be predicted)

4) Verify the potential mark (as currently used) Functions As A Mark, and (this avoids specimen refusals, trade name refusals, and others. The USPTO is looking for valid use not just any use of a mark.)

5) Verify that the Goods and Services ID is both the correct and the maximum claim that are user can make and verify that the Goods and Services ID meets USPTO requirements before filing. (This avoids office actions to correct incorrect IDs  which can slow down a registration. Incorrect IDs  may be corrected during the prosecution of a trademark if they do not materially alter the mark or the ID. Correcting problems before application saves time and money. Filing in a new class after an application has been submitted to cure a problem ID is the same price as a new application in that class.)

*We don’t stop here but this is a good start!


Call us at 1-651-500-7590   for a Strong Trademark. A Strong Trademark is Not Just a tool to increase sales to customers–it is also easier to sell to your investors & licensees.

We can help you create and protect an inherently distinctive trademark.


Valid and Invalid Uses of Words, Number, Symbols, etc. as Trademarks

This is not an exhaustive list or a conclusive list, each potential trademark is considered individually by the USPTO and the courts with respect to the goods, services & facts involved.

The applicable law for trademarks: Trademark Act §§1, 2 and 45, 15 U.S.C. §§1051, 1052, and 1127.

The applicable law for service marks: Trademark Act §§1, 2, 3 and 45, 15 U.S.C. §§1051, 1052, 1053 and 1127.

For examples of Strong Trademarks vs. Weak Trademarks, see StrongTrademark.com


VALID MARK-Functions as a Mark

NOT VALID MARK-Does Not Function as a Mark

A trademark should be distinguishable from the rest of the text by use of a different font, different size font, different color or some other designation to consistently indicate these words or this symbol is being claimed.

When the alleged trademark is not set apart in any way to show prominence with respect to other words, for instance a mission statement, like a slogan, can serve as a trademark, but if the words are mixed in with other words and not set off to describe the source of the product or service, it is just a slogan not a trademark.

A trademark should be used as an adjective (not a noun or verb) to indicate that the product or service comes from a particular source.

When trade names are used solely as nouns, such as if the specimen uses the trade name with an address and does not show what goods or services are connected with the trade name.

The generic name of the class of goods or services follows the trademark, such as Bond-Aid® Wetting Agent (for a registered trademark).

When a claimed trademark is merely used to describe the qualities of a product and not used in a trademark sense to describe the source of the product. Example: The mark SOFT.COM for facial tissues is merely descriptive of the tissue.

The appropriate symbols should be placed next to the mark to designate that this is a claimed trademark. TM or SM can designate unregistered trademarks or service marks and ® is used for USPTO registered trademarks or service marks. Example: or AA DealFinderSM  for an unregistered trademark.. Other countries use the ® as well, please consult local practices.

When a domain name that is merely used as a domain name (noun that acts as address on internet) and not used to describe the source of the product or services.

The first time the mark is used in text, a footnote can indicate the source of the mark.

Background designs such as common geometrical shapes and borders


Titles of single works


Informational matter that is descriptive


Model or series numbers and grade designations


Names of artists and authors


Telephone numbers such as 1-800-555-NAME where merely adding numbers to a name does not make it distinctive just as adding Inc. to a trade name does not make it distinctive.

Search Not Just Patents® sites:

PO Box 18716, Minneapolis, MN 55418  

1-651-500-7590     info@notjustpatents.com



Not Just

Patents®

Legal Services


Inherently-Distinctive.com

Why is Being Inherently Distinctive Important to a Trademark or Domain Name?

Call 1-651-500-7590   or email info@notjustpatents.com for Responses to Office Action; File or Defend an Opposition or Cancellation; Patent or Trademark Searches and Application; Send or Respond to Cease and Desist Letters.

For more information from Not Just Patents, see our other sites.       

Patents

Trademarks

How to Patent An Invention

Steps to a Patent Search

Strong Trademark       Enforcing Trade Name Rights

Steps to Common Law Trademark Rights

Should I Get A Trademark or Patent?

Patentability Evaluation

Trademark Disclaimers-What are they, standard formats, etc.

Examples of Disclaimers  Business Name Cease and Desist

35 U.S.C. 101 Inventions patentable.

Verify a Trademark  Why Verify a Trademark?

35 U.S.C. 102 Conditions for patentability; novelty and loss of right to patent.

Using Slogans (Taglines), Model Numbers as Trademarks

Which format? When Should I  Use Standard Characters?

35 U.S.C. 103 Conditions for patentability; non-obvious subject matter.

What Standard Characters are Available?  Trademark Statistics

Stop Before You Send (Cease and Desist Letters)

35 U.S.C. 282 Presumption of validity; defenses

Trademark Refusals    Does not Function as a Mark Refusals

37 CFR § 1.53 Application number, filing date, and completion of application

Acceptable Specimen       Supplemental Register

What Does A USPTO Trademark Application Look Like?

Filing Requirements for Patent Applications

Trademark Attorney for Overcoming Office Actions

Functional Trademarks   How to Trademark

List of U.S. Patent Classifications

Grounds for Opposition & Cancellation     Cease and Desist Letter

How Do U.S. Patent Classifications Work?

Valid/Invalid Use of Trademarks     Trademark Searching

Patent Statistics     Sample Patent, Trademark & Copyright Inventory Forms

Examples and General Rules for Likelihood of Confusion

USPTO Search Method for Likelihood of Confusion

Proximate Function

Color as Trade Dress  3D Marks as Trade Dress

Invention Information-  What is the Invention?

Ornamental Refusal (a type of Specimen Refusal)

Patent Field of Search

Inherently Distinctive Trademarks

Patent search-New invention

Merely Descriptive Trademarks   Merely Descriptive Refusals

Patent Search-Non-Obvious

Register a Trademark-Step by Step

Difference between Provisional and Nonprovisional Patent Application

Likelihood of confusion-Circuit Court tests

How to Respond to Cease and Desist Letters

Converting Provisional to Nonprovisional Patent Application (or claiming benefit of)

Pseudo Marks     RegistrationOfATrademark.com

What Does ‘Use in Commerce’ Mean?    SCAM Letters

Shop Rights

Section 2(d) Refusals   ApplyToTrademark.com

Patent Pending see also Patent Marking

Typical Brand Name Refusals  What is a Family of Marks?

Patent Drawings

Trademark Steps Trademark Registration Answers TESS  TARR TDR

Trademark Searching Using TESS

TSDR Trademark Status and Document Retrieval

Reduction to Practice

Published for Opposition see also Opposition Steps/Cancellation Steps

How to Respond to Office Actions

What is a Compact Patent Prosecution?

Protecting Trademark Rights (Common Law)

Steps in a Trademark Opposition Process

Statutory Invention Registrations

What is the Difference between Principal & Supplemental Register?

Patent steps

How to Respond to Office Actions

PCT Patent Application information

Trademark Clearance Search  Don’t Stop at a Weak Mark

Provisional Patent Effect on Patentability

ID of Goods and Services see also Headings (list) of International Trademark Classes

Broad Patents

Geographically Descriptive or Deceptive

Making Amendments in Response to Office Actions

Why do Federal Registrations of Trademarks Get Better Protection? Why do Distinctive Trademarks Get Better Protection?

Examples of Office Actions & Responses 2nd 3rd

Trademark Incontestability  TTAB Manual (TBMP) May 2011

Trade Secrets

What are Abandoned Trademarks? Can I Use An Abandoned Trademark?  Can I Abandon a Trademark During An Opposition?

State & Federal Trade Secret Laws

Differences between TEAS and TEAS plus

Chart of Patent vs. Trade Secret

What Does Published for Opposition Mean?

How to Keep A Trade Secret

Acquired Distinctiveness  Extension of Time to Oppose

©2008-2012 All Rights Reserved. Not Just Patents LLC, PO Box 18716, Minneapolis, MN 55418.

Call: 1-651-500-7590   or email: info@notjustpatents.com. This web site is for informational purposes only and is provided without warranties, express or implied, regarding the information's accuracy, timeliness, or completeness and does not constitute legal advice. No attorney/client relationship exists without a written contract between Not Just Patents LLC and its client.  Privacy Policy Contact Us             See us at NotJustPatents.com

Loading